So in Pokemon Breeding, Gardevoir is part of the Amorphous type egg group. Which is defined as "Pokémon in this group are amorphous, having no definite form."
WHAT? So 
So then:
BUT....
I guess it's fair I explain why I choose a Gardevoir as the potential love interest for my self insert in WoC. To be honest, I have a fetish for girls that aren't quite human. Usually this means things like mermaids, fairys, elves, etc. That's why if I ever do self inserts, you'll probably see my love interests being not human. Like Lucia-arah in my Star Wars game. Plus I'm kind of a fan of risque relationships. Gardevoir is on the edge of what I consider acceptable as far as not being human though. If Gardveoir didn't exist, I probably would have gone with a human girl.
Before you go calling me furfag, I'm not really into furries. I do not consider Gardevoir a furry, no more then I consider Liara T'Soni (Mass Effect) or Aylaa Secura (Star Wars) to be furries. (Krystal from Star Fox is a furry). Not that I think people who like furries are wrong, if that's what they like. There are some fetishes I find weird, but I'm more likely to just ask why rather then harass them about it.
Honestly, I don't get why people even complain about it in the first place. Does it make their balls bigger or something?
Everybody "knew a guy..."
Age 41, Male
South River
Joined on 10/7/04
- Level:
- 25
- Exp Points:
- 6,572 / 6,940
- Exp Rank:
- 6,436
- Vote Power:
- 6.65 votes
- Rank:
- Portal Security
- Global Rank:
- 23,394
- Blams:
- 220
- Saves:
- 206
- B/P Bonus:
- 8%
- Whistle:
- Normal
- Trophies:
- 14
- Medals:
- 401
- Supporter:
- 10y
Really?
Posted by teejay-number13 - July 7th, 2014
Comments
Cannot believe what I'm reading... Pokemon are fictional animals/battle monsters! That is why its weird to see them paired up with humans, let alone self insertion characters.
So my Gardevoir character in WoC strikes you as just an animal huh? I don't really get why you mentioned "fictional" though? Of course Pokemon are fictional, so is my self-inserted character. Are you implying that I'm trying to say it's real? Are you saying I'm not allowed to discuss a topic because it's based on a fictional story?
I heard an theory that Pokémon and humans were able to be married or mated in old times, proof of that was the library in Pokémon Diamond/Pearl/Platinum having books about that so, I find this to quite funny at the same time interesting but that is just me, what do you this?
Really? What did the books say?
I don't even know what you're complaining about here. I still think pairing up Gard and Teejay is stupid, especially because Gard is an emotional trainwreck and acts like a 5 year old and Teejay's character is mature, stiff and never emotes to anything. Its not risque or creative, its weird and forced.
Well that's a better argument for them not to be together then the inter-species thing. But we're only on episode 9/25, so Gard has plenty of time to "grow up". It's actually part of her character development. And it's not like they're getting married in the next episode. Too often in stories, I see the female being the overly mature one while the male is the immature one that has to grow up. I try and do my best not to make anything seem too forced.
I guess I'm complaining about people who use the amorphous egg group thing as an reason to say Gardevoirs can't be with humans. So a Gardevoir/Muk union is okay but a Gardevoir/human union is weird?
Dude, this is why :) http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/sabtastic/gardevoir-commission (anatomy notwithstanding...) In the end, it's just a cartoon/game thing, no big whoop. Plus she's sentient, she can communicate her urges *cue decent 70's porn instrumentals* Just write the best script you can, after all, it's part of an epic that's earned you a couple hundred fans. It's been a great and consistently good story so far, I have faith in you to conclude it well.
It's a good picture, but Sabtastic always gets Gardevoir's hands wrong. Thanks for the compliments. I think people will be pleased with how the story turns out.
I'm sure she'd say it was 'artistic license', but she's a bit overdue in getting my picture completed, so I won't defend her too vigorously.
Kinda surprised your YT page is so quiet... and no playlist for P:WOC? How many hours of footage is there so far? If I had an account there, I'd say the series was (is) a definite pick for binge watching :)
I'll probably post new eps there, but honestly, I don't like youtube. I think they're copyright nazis. I'm surprised they haven't banned my pokemon videos yet.
Huh... I must say, as someone who barely touched the Pokémon series (by that I mean I briefly played Emerald), I'm confused. If the official Gardevoir pairings are this strange, I really can't blame you for pairing WoC's Gardevoir with your WoC persona. A Gardevoir and a Muk... How'd that even work? A Ditto I can understand, but this...? I don't get it. And it's probably better that way.
Regardless of such, I must applaud you, Teejay. It really takes some guts to admit your fetishes in a public website. If it weren't for all the scandals about Obama spying on us Brazilians, I would've done the same, preferably on a website such as this; something I know my family doesn't visit. Not only that, you apply said fetish in your movie series, and to hell with any naysayers on that decision. Very brave. I salute you, sir (convenient, because you said you served the military)! With all that said, I hope to see more of your series soon-ish, and I'll most definitely observe the relationship between Trainer-Teejay and Gardevoir with great expectations. Keep fighting the good fight, sir! Mr. Br signing off.
PS.: About your question regarding the books in Diamond/Pearl/Platinum, these are excerpts from these books, in the American and Japanese versions of the games:
American: There were once Pokémon that became very close to humans. It was a time when there were no differences to distinguish them.
Japanese: There was a time when Pokémon married people. There was a time when people married Pokémon. That was normal because, a long time ago, people and Pokémon were the same species.
So yeah... Apparently, you're not alone on that mindset!
Source: Nintendo Blast
PPS.: If my lack of experience with Pokémon makes you not want to talk on a technical level about it with me... fear not. I plan on picking up Pokémon Y later this week.
A time when people and Pokemon were the same species? Well, that certainly doesn't fit in with the lore I'm planning to use in the WoC series, so I'll probably ignore it. Thanks for looking it up for me though.
Even if Obama is spying on Brazil, I highly doubt its to learn what people's fetishes are. Honestly, I can't help but feel like your second paragraph is a bit sarcastic. I don't think being attracted to fantasy girls is some ultra taboo thing just because I called it a fetish. In real life, it translates to me being more attracted to girls of a different ethnicity or skin color then my own.
when i was playing pokemon smerald i put a seedot (female) and a wailord (male) in the pokecare center thing, (it wasnt intended) and they had a egg, does that mean a giant whale can mate with such a little thing? in the last generation they still saying that they dont known where the eggs come from, seems like they dont want to discover why XD.
Obviously as a kids game, they can't imply that Pokemon screw. Maybe the daycare center conducts secret artificial insemination procedures.
i believe in one of the game's legends/history said that at one point they existed as one and you couldn't tell the difference between humans and pokemon alike, so it might not be uncommon in the pokemon world for something like this to happen... so i have no problem with this
i have wondered about the same thing....i mean why is that?
Actually I think Amorphous for Gardevoir means she can phase through things without any problems as she incorporeal as in has no true physical form
TheGamechanger
I personally think that the Pokedex gender ratios a little messed up......for example, Pokemon that look like they should be an all-female species (like Gardevoir) or an all-male species (like Machamp or Conkeldurr) aren't listed as such. The same can be said of some of the legendary and mythical Pokemon.
teejay-number13
I guess non-sexually dimorphic pokemon are a bit easier to make. That way you don't always need two different sprites for the same species.